April 8, 2026
Demand Planning: how to improve your forecasts
Three key levers to structure your Demand Planning

APS and EPM projects should not be approached like traditional IT projects. They involve industrial planning, cross-team coordination, data governance and, more broadly, how the organization makes and arbitrates its operational decisions.
At the Supply Chain Event, we brought together Axel Rousseau (Pochet Group) and Julien Triquet (Yoplait – Sodiaal) to share their experience on major transformation projects delivered with Anaplan. Two different industrial contexts, two distinct trajectories, yet converging lessons on what truly makes the difference in a transformation program.
From these discussions emerged a clear observation: the success of an APS or EPM project does not depend solely on the platform chosen, but on the consistency between business ambition, technical architecture and governance.
This ebook provides a structured synthesis of these insights.
The Pochet Group, faced with a loss of visibility after Covid and increasing complexity in its flows, launched a progressive transformation to restore a robust and shared planning framework. Each phase had to deliver visible results, strengthen business adoption and create tangible value.
At Yoplait – Sodiaal, the challenges were of a different nature: ultra-fresh planning, daily granularity, strong operational constraints and the simultaneous replacement of several legacy solutions. The complexity of the context required a model capable of handling a high level of granularity while remaining manageable.
These experiences show that no two projects are ever the same. However, certain structural principles consistently emerge: the quality of the scoping phase, methodological discipline, and the balance between ambition and organizational maturity.
Across these feedback sessions, several factors appear to be decisive:
These dimensions are rarely highlighted in project communications, yet they determine the depth of the model and the stability of the transformation.
Discussions with the Pochet Group and Yoplait – Sodiaal confirmed a reality we have observed for several years: project drifts rarely stem from a lack of technology, but rather from misalignment between business vision, architecture and governance.
We wanted to build on these experiences to produce a clear and structured guide for Supply Chain, Finance and Industrial leaders embarking on an APS or EPM project.
This ebook will help you:
This is not a theoretical discussion, but a perspective grounded in real projects carried out in demanding industrial environments.
If you are planning to structure or accelerate an APS or EPM initiative, this guide will provide concrete reference points to secure your decisions and anchor the value created over the long term.
Webform
APS, EPM: The levers that transform your projects
Behind the ebook
When industry and agribusiness share their keys to success in planning
With deep planning experience in luxury and fashion, Hugo has lived firsthand the transformation that a collaborative planning platform can drive, integrating Supply Chain, Finance, Merchandising, and Sales on a single model (Anaplan). Combining business insight, technical depth, and a clear consulting mindset, he has led successful deployments for 8+ years. He serves as engagement lead for clients across Retail, Luxury, Food & Beverage, Services, and Industry, while also steering OneHive’s strategic and commercial development. Hugo is a graduate of Centrale Paris.
Axel Rousseau is responsible for Supply Chain transformation projects at Groupe Pochet. He works on the evolution of industrial and planning processes in a demanding manufacturing environment, with a strong focus on structure, coordination and execution. He contributes to large scale transformation initiatives aimed at strengthening operational performance and Supply Chain robustness.
Julien Triquet is a Planning Information Systems Project Manager at Sodiaal. He is involved in the design, coordination and deployment of planning solutions supporting industrial and Supply Chain processes. His role focuses on aligning business requirements with information systems to ensure reliable planning, secure execution and strong user adoption.
Discover our case studies
Article
April 8, 2026
Three key levers to structure your Demand Planning
Cas Client
Industrial planning
Pochet Group structured its production planning, Demand Planning and S&OP in Anaplan to manage its multi-site industrial Supply Chain.
Cas Client
Assortment and replenishment
By structuring its retail replenishment on Anaplan, Messika, a luxury jewellery house, secures decision-making and supports its international growth.
Discover answers to key questions about our services and approach.
An APS (Advanced Planning System) and an EPM (Enterprise Performance Management) both address planning needs, but historically they have focused on different areas.
An APS is mainly used to optimise supply chain operations: demand forecasting, production planning, capacity management and distribution planning. It allows complex industrial constraints to be integrated in order to improve operational performance.
Historically, EPM has been geared towards financial planning and overall company performance. It enables the modelling of budgets, forecasts and financial scenarios in order to align operational decisions with economic objectives.
Today, these two approaches are gradually converging. Platforms such as Anaplan enable supply chain, commercial and financial planning to be connected within the same environment. This convergence allows organisations to make more consistent decisions and manage their performance holistically.
The challenges in planning projects rarely stem from the technology itself. They are often linked to insufficient scoping, weak data governance, or a lack of alignment between business teams, IT, and senior management.
An APS or EPM project involves modelling complex processes and transforming decision-making practices. Without a clear methodology and the involvement of operational teams, value creation may be slower than expected.
Most companies succeed in their projects by adopting a gradual approach. Rather than transforming all processes in a single step, they structure their trajectory into several phases, allowing them to create value at each milestone.
That approach simplifies user adoption, limits complexity, and allows the model to be adjusted as the organisation matures.
Many companies today are seeking to align their operational decisions with their financial objectives. This involves connecting supply chain, commercial and financial planning within a single environment.
Connected Planning platforms such as Anaplan enable these interactions to be modelled and different scenarios to be evaluated in order to improve consistency between operational plans and economic objectives.
Planning projects rarely fail because of technology. Difficulties most often arise from insufficient scoping, overly ambitious scope, or poorly defined data governance.
Another common mistake is trying to model too many specific cases from the outset. The most successful projects favour a gradual approach, with clear objectives and visible value creation at each stage.
Les retours d’expérience présentés dans cet ebook illustrent précisément ces points et montrent comment certaines entreprises ont structuré leur transformation pour éviter ces dérives.
Didn’t find what you were looking for?
Contact usLet’s explore how we can make your project a success.
Connect with our experts